Fox News cut to Chuck Shumer a lot.
No mention of the deficit, either.
Nice, strong ending.
Overall, I was surprised. The speech was narrow in its focus. It had tons of random, micro-proposals that sound nice on paper, but have little chance of getting passed. It was more of a first term SOTU, not the speech of someone who has been in office for three, going on four, years. The speech seemed as if a focus group gathered a bunch of people together, tested what proposals sounded good, and then threw them into the speech. There was no overarching proposal or idea. It was a well delivered speech, but very empty. Hollow. I think the word I’m looking for is unambitious.
I think people will like it. It will likely give him some boost in his poll numbers. But did it change the election, did it provide anything lasting?
I don’t think so.
No comments:
Post a Comment